More Golden Compass
The controversy over the "real meanings" behind Philip Pullman's His Dark Materials trilogy of books is becoming a minor media stir. He's making the rounds promoting the upcoming film The Golden Compass and trying to play down quotes in the media suggesting that the books are an attack on Christianity or designed to recruit young minds into the exciting world of atheism.
Since I haven't read the books, I found this 2005 breakdown of the series by Mark Greene at the London Institute for Contemporary Christianity really helpful. Even better is his encouragement to Christians to be available to correct the record about God's character for those persuaded by Pullman's ideas. The whole thing is worth a read if you're following this, but I especially like his summation.
Since I haven't read the books, I found this 2005 breakdown of the series by Mark Greene at the London Institute for Contemporary Christianity really helpful. Even better is his encouragement to Christians to be available to correct the record about God's character for those persuaded by Pullman's ideas. The whole thing is worth a read if you're following this, but I especially like his summation.
Indeed, Pullman's propaganda may well be most dangerous to children and adults who have never known the love of the living God and do see the church as an out-of-date, life-denying, power-hungry and ultimately self-seeking institution. It may simply confirm their prejudices. As such, Pullman may succeed in turning many a child away from the true God he calls 'the enemy.' Nevertheless, Pullman has laid down his gauntlet in public, and the very success of his books and the explicitness of his attack may well provide Christians of all ages with many an opportunity to present the truth.
Certainly, we must oppose his ideas, and he expects no less. Nevertheless, he has left himself extremely vulnerable - his books almost entirely ignore Jesus. Perhaps he could find no way to twist such loving self-sacrifice into ammunition for the case against God. After all, a God who will deliberately sacrifice himself out of love is a long, long way from the malevolent and impotent cripple of Pullman's imagination. Indeed, we might pray that he soon discovers that the door into heaven will not be cut by an extraordinary and unique knife but has been already been flung wide open by the submission of the Son to some very ordinary nails.


4 Comments:
Hi Christopher,
I was thrilled to find your post this morning, as I agree with your conclusion. I think that Christians need to be aware of the themes embedded in this movie, but I don't think that means we should avoid it. Critically reviewing this movie might actually give us the chance to respond honestly to our atheists friends and families. Thanks for the link to the 2005 breakdown as well!
you post a comment of mine from way back when when i swore
yet forget my comment agreeing with the infidels?
way to censure!!!
Brian: You were neither censured nor censored. If you scroll down a bit, you'll notice two posts on this whole Golden Compass business. You commented on the other and we giddily approved it -- as we did this one accusing us of an ungainly use of power. See?
No need to go all exclamation marky on us. We embrace your thoughtful and/or snarky rebukes (even when we disagree).
While I am a whole hearted Christian, I am also very open to books even if written by atheisit authors. My parents have told me that they think I am old enough and mature enough to decide for myself on whether or not I should read something and agree with what is said or disagree. I have read the Golden Compass although I haven't seen the movie. I have not had the chance to read the other two books though, so I can not say what happens in those books. But in the book I found nothing dangerously wrong with it. It isn't for kids though because it has science in it that can be confusing and complicated if you didn't pay attention in science class. There are three things I found that were wrong.
1) A disrespect for almost all authority. While sometimes breaking the rules can be a good thing, these are few and far between. God tells us to follow the law and authority.
2) Although this wasn't a major problem for me, it is for other people. In the book they have creatures called daemons which is basically a physical manifisatation of your soul and when you hit puberty becomes fixed in a certian animal shape that fits your personality. Ex. Servants daemons were usually dogs, while independent people usually had a form of a cat. Pullman his self has said that the word is supposed to be said like demon. But if you were to look up the actual pronoucition of a conjoined a and e it is supposed to be said as a soft "a" such as in apple. So really the word should be said as "damon" but this isn't a huge point with me.
3) The biggest part that is wrong is that Pullman changes the Bible. He quotes the Bible in the Golden Compass but changes it to include daemons. He changes the part of the creation story saying how daemons were created right along with their human. This is utterly wrong to change the Bible to conform to the story.
But it will tell you that the story does not take place in our world. It takes place in a parallel world which is just like ours except for the physical manifestation of souls. Our world is in the other books though and if someone from their world travels to ours their daemon is sucked into the body or is in the body and is no longer physical. If we were to go to their world a deamon would appear. But that is an important thing to remember if you read the book. It is a seperate world. And I wouldn't let young children read it until they are mature and after they at least have taken a high school science class or get them something to help them understand some of the more science-y things in the book. And I can't say anything about the other books because I haven't read them. I'm sorry this is more of a blog itself than just a comment.
Post a Comment
<< Home